FCC Lifeline changes could reduce eligibility or monthly support, according to FCC Democratic Commissioner Ana M. Gomez, who argued the plan is “shortsighted” amid rising living costs and after the expiration of the Affordable Connectivity Program.
Gomez said eligible households could lose up to $9.25 per month, and up to $34.25 on Tribal lands if the plan passes next month. She urged lawmakers to consider affordability rather than creating new barriers to access the program.
Separately, FCC Chairman Brendan Carr defended the proposal as a crackdown on waste, fraud, and abuse. He cited inspector general advisories and claims that Lifeline misuse has occurred, including cases tied to California, as evidence that the program needs tighter verification and oversight.
Carr argued that the current verification process does not adequately prevent duplicative subscriptions and other abuses, noting that California’s opt-out status has been revoked to tighten subscriber eligibility checks.
Gomez countered that Republicans on the FCC are using Lifeline as a political tool and contended the commission should focus on making connectivity more affordable for those who can least afford higher bills rather than erecting new barriers.
With a vote on the plan expected next month, Carr stressed that the public should see Lifeline funds directed to the households Congress intended, while Gomez called for safeguards that preserve affordability and simplicity for vulnerable communities.
