A wave of questions surrounds the fate of BEAD funds, with billions potentially remaining unspent as policy shifts unfold.
When the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law passed in 2021, few anticipated that billions could sit idle; by 2025, a political shift has led to new BEAD guidance from the White House’s cabinet, and states have begun revising proposals to align with it.
StateScoop, citing the Advanced Communications Law and Policy Institute at New York Law School, found that more than $20 billion of BEAD funds remained unspent across 49 states and 3 territories (excluding California, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and Puerto Rico).
Policy ideas include using savings to back state loan guarantees to accelerate deployments; Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry proposed letting states keep funds if used for AI or “America First” priorities, arguing it would demonstrate financial savvy in the administration’s portfolio.
NTIA Administrator Arielle Roth touted the savings as a product of rising private-sector participation and higher matching commitments by subgrantees, noting that the money could help deliver high-speed connectivity more efficiently.”
Analysts caution that large unspent balances could affect deployment speed and consumer costs if not deployed promptly, while critics warn that political constraints could limit how savings are applied. The BEAD program’s future remains a focal point for lawmakers seeking faster, cheaper broadband access while managing federal savings.